Welcome to Our Media Page
Connecticut Court Issues Landmark $31.9 Million Verdict Establishing National NICU Informed Consent Standard iHeart Radio
In a groundbreaking ruling that promises to reshape standards of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) nationwide, the Connecticut Superior Court delivered a resounding $31,962,884.42 verdict on December 12, 2025, against Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale University. This landmark decision holds the defendants accountable for breaching fundamental informed consent principles, which tragically contributed to the death of extremely premature infant Aries-Reign Peterson from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The parents had repeatedly and clearly voiced their desire for exclusive human breast milk feeding, yet the hospital proceeded with its internal "protocol" to administer bovine-based fortifier and formula—without any disclosure of the known risks, discussion of safer alternatives, or securing parental approval. Medical literature has long established that these cow-milk-derived products substantially elevate the risk of NEC, a devastating intestinal condition that strikes vulnerable preemies, and human-based options like Prolacta were commercially available at the time, even if not stocked by the facility.
The case culminated in an intensive eight-day bench trial, after which Judge Goodrow issued a comprehensive 29-page Memorandum of Decision. In it, the court unequivocally classified the hospital's actions as both civil battery—due to the offensive contact of unconsented feeding—and a profound failure of informed consent. Critically, the ruling found that the bovine products were more likely than not a substantial factor in causing Aries-Reign's NEC and untimely death. This precedent-setting outcome establishes a crystal-clear national standard: NICUs must obtain explicit parental consent before introducing bovine-based fortifiers or formulas when human milk alternatives exist. The court rejected the hospital's reliance on rigid protocols as a shield, emphasizing that parents deserve full transparency on the nature of feeding products, the heightened NEC risks (including potential death), and viable human-based substitutes. To reflect the immense grief and gravity of the violations, the award included $30 million in non-economic damages, alongside economic losses, totaling nearly $32 million in justice for a family forever changed.
Securing this transformative win was the collaborative prowess of Levin, Rojas, Camassar & Reck—one of the founding firms that ignited the national infant formula and NEC litigation over five years ago, well before it captured widespread attention—bolstered by co-trial counsel Austin Johns, now Of Counsel to Connecticut Injury Firm. Mr. Johns was instrumental in dismantling misleading terminology, such as labeling cow-milk fortifiers as "human milk fortifiers," while proving the clinical viability of alternatives and that any reasonable parent would have declined bovine feeding upon learning the risks. His expertise exemplifies Connecticut Injury Firm's dedication to trial-ready advocacy that not only resolves disputes but forges enduring reforms in patient safety and autonomy.
At Connecticut Injury Firm, this verdict embodies our core mission: holding powerful institutions accountable, safeguarding informed decision-making, and driving transparency through the civil justice system. As one of our representatives aptly stated, "This case transcends a single judgment—it's a mandate for openness where secrecy once prevailed, ensuring parents are empowered, not excluded, in the most critical medical choices for their children." We remain steadfast in representing families nationwide in medical negligence, wrongful death, nursing home abuse, and catastrophic injury matters, with a sharpened focus on systemic failures, hidden dangers, and institutional lapses. Through victories like this, we honor Aries-Reign's memory by protecting countless vulnerable infants and their loved ones moving forward.
Links:
https://www.law.com/ctlawtribune/2025/12/17/lawyers-want-their-clients-32-million-judgment-to-change-care-for-premature-babies-nationwide/?slreturn=20251218103353
https://nypost.com/2025/12/12/us-news/ct-judge-awards-nearly-32m-to-parents-after-premature-baby-dies-from-hospital-feeding-error/
https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/east/2025/12/17/851434.htm
https://www.wtnh.com/news/connecticut/new-haven/parents-attorneys-emphasizing-importance-of-informed-consent-to-nicus-following-babys-death-at-yale-new-haven-hospital/
iHeart Radio
At the Connecticut Injury Firm, we're on a mission to confront the silent epidemic of nursing home neglect head-on through our impactful radio interview on iHeart Radio, "Protecting Nursing Home Residents." Recorded live on December 3rd and set to air this Sunday, December 7th, We'll dissect the hidden failures in Connecticut's long-term care system, from spotting insidious red flags to wielding the full force of state and federal laws to demand accountability and justice.
The stakes couldn't be higher in Connecticut, where an aging population—projected to see the share of residents aged 60 and older reach nearly 26% by 2030, an increase of about 30% from 2012 levels—relies on approximately 195 operating nursing facilities for dignified support. Yet, the reality is grim: Approximately one in ten adults aged 60 or older experiences abuse, neglect, or exploitation annually, with nursing homes often at the epicenter of these violations. Facilities frequently face complaints related to care quality, often tied to chronic understaffing that leaves residents vulnerable. Nationally echoed in our state, a study of over 2,000 nursing home residents revealed that 44% reported experiencing abuse, while a shocking 95% said they had either been neglected or witnessed another resident being neglected—manifesting as untreated wounds, isolation, or basic needs ignored. As of late 2024, Connecticut had 195 Medicare-rated nursing homes, with many carrying deficiencies that highlight ongoing challenges in the sector. This fuels a caregiver crisis, as evidenced by over 5,700 unionized workers threatening strikes in 2025 amid demands for better wages and conditions, underscoring the strain on the system.
Under Connecticut law, nursing homes are legally bound to provide care free from harm, enshrined in statutes like CGS § 17a-412, which defines elder abuse as the willful infliction of physical pain, injury, or mental anguish—and mandates immediate reporting by anyone with reasonable cause to suspect it. This includes acts or omissions like failing to prevent falls, overmedicating to sedate, or neglecting hygiene that leads to infections. Violations trigger investigations by the Department of Public Health's Facility Licensing and Investigation Section (FLIS), with penalties ranging from civil fines up to $500 per infraction to criminal charges under CGS § 53a-61a for assault on the elderly—a Class A misdemeanor carrying up to a year in jail. For families, civil claims hinge on proving negligence's four pillars: the facility's duty of care, its breach through inaction, direct causation of harm, and quantifiable damages like medical bills or emotional distress. With a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury suits, time is critical—yet many cases go unreported due to fear, shame, or lack of awareness.
Spotting neglect early can be a lifesaver, and the signs are often subtle but telling: Unexplained bruises, fractures, or head injuries from unassisted mobility; rapid weight loss or dehydration signaling withheld nutrition; persistent bedsores (pressure ulcers) from immobility; foul odors or unkempt appearance indicating hygiene lapses; sudden emotional shifts like withdrawal, anxiety, depression, or unexplained aggression; overmedication causing drowsiness or falls; and even financial anomalies from exploitation. These aren't isolated mishaps—they stem from systemic issues like inadequate staffing ratios, poor training, and lax oversight, breaching residents' rights under the federal Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 and Connecticut's Patients' Bill of Rights (CGS § 19a-550), which guarantee dignity, privacy, and freedom from restraints or abuse.
Our interview isn't just talk—it's a call to action. In a state where regulators handle thousands of elder complaints yearly, knowledge is your strongest ally. We're not only protecting individual loved ones but pushing for broader change: Better funding, whistleblower protections, and zero-tolerance policies to ensure no elder suffers in silence.
Sources
Here is a full list of the sources referenced in the inline citations above:
- Citation 1: "ANNUAL NURSING FACILITY CENSUS September 30, 2024" by Connecticut Office of Policy and Management (Published: September 30, 2024). URL: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/opm/hhs/ltc/nf-fact-sheet-2024.pdf?rev=2bc5d9905f494f2aa49f861f1003ad7b. Excerpt: "A total of 195 licensed nursing facilities were operating in Connecticut on September 30, 2024, five less than in 2023."
- Citation 2: "As CT 1199 strike deadline looms, nursing homes face staffing crisis" by CT Mirror (Published: May 6, 2025). URL: https://ctmirror.org/2025/05/06/ct-seiu-1199-nursing-homes-strike/. Excerpt: "About 5,700 union members are working at these 51 homes under expired contracts that pay employees about $18 to $22 per hour, said SEIU 1199NE President Kathy Sexton."
- Citation 3: "Responding to Elder Abuse in Connecticut" by U.S. Department of Justice (Publication date not specified, accessed 2025). URL: https://www.justice.gov/file/1008341/dl?inline=. Excerpt: "At least 10% of adults age 60 and older will experience some form of elder abuse in a given year, with some older adults experiencing multiple types of abuse."
- Citation 4: "Elder Abuse & Nursing Home Abuse Statistics 2025" by Sokolove Law (Published: November 12, 2025). URL: https://www.sokolovelaw.com/nursing-home-abuse/statistics/. Excerpt: "In a recent study, 44% of nursing home residents reported being abused, and 95% had been neglected or seen another resident suffer neglect."
- Citation 5: "Connecticut General Statutes § 17a-412. (Formerly Sec. 17b-407). Report of suspected abuse, neglect, exploitation or abandonment" by Justia Law (Accessed 2025). URL: https://law.justia.com/codes/connecticut/title-17a/chapter-319h/section-17a-412-formerly-sec-17b-407/. Excerpt: "Defines elder abuse as the willful, with intent to injure, impair or destroy the health of a person sixty years of age or older... and mandates immediate reporting by anyone with reasonable cause."
- Citation 6: "MANDATORY REPORTING OF ELDER ABUSE" by Connecticut General Assembly (Published: September 21, 2012, but statute current as of 2025). URL: https://cga.ct.gov/2012/rpt/2012-R-0437.htm. Excerpt: "If the failure to report is intentional, the person can be charged with a Class C misdemeanor (up to 3 months imprisonment, a fine up to $500..."
- Citation 7: "Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-61a. (2024)" by Justia Law (Accessed 2025). URL: https://law.justia.com/codes/connecticut/title-53a/chapter-952/section-53a-61a/. Excerpt: "Assault of an elderly... term of imprisonment of one year which shall not be suspended or reduced."
- Citation 8: "Complaint backlog at CT nursing homes, hospitals is years long" by Hartford Business Journal (Published: April 18, 2024). URL: https://hartfordbusiness.com/article/complaint-backlog-at-ct-nursing-homes-hospitals-is-years-long/. Excerpt: "The state Department of Public Health is wading through a backlog of 2,400 unaddressed complaints from nursing home residents..."
- Citation 9: "Connecticut General Statutes § 19a-550 (2019) - (Formerly Sec. 19-610). Patients' bill of rights" by Justia Law (Accessed 2025). URL: https://law.justia.com/codes/connecticut/2019/title-19a/chapter-368v/section-19a-550/. Excerpt: "There is established a patients' bill of rights for any person admitted as a patient to any nursing home facility... which includes rights to dignity, privacy, and freedom from abuse."
- Citation 10: "Connecticut Nursing Home Abuse Laws" by Wieand Law Firm (Accessed 2025). URL: https://www.wieandlaw.com/state-by-state/connecticut-nursing-home-neglect-laws/. Excerpt: "The statute of limitations for negligence claims is two years from the date the injury is sustained or discovered..."
- Citation 11: "Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 - Understand its Impact" by Nursing Home Abuse Center (Published: October 3, 2025). URL: https://www.nursinghomeabusecenter.com/resources/nursing-home-reform-act/. Excerpt: "The act establishes the minimum care standards for nursing homes and defines the legal rights of nursing home residents [under the 1987 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act]."
- Citation 12: "Connecticut Population" by Administration for Community Living (ACL.gov) (Publication date not specified, accessed 2025). URL: https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/programs/2016-11/Connecticut%2520Epi%2520Profile%2520Final.pdf. Excerpt: "The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that nearly 26 percent of Connecticut's population will be 60 and older by the year 2030, an increase of 30 percent from 2012."
Other Media
Tragic Neglect Lawsuit: $100M Claim Against CT DCF in Jacqueline Torres-Garcia Case
Published: December 9, 2025
The estate of 3-year-old Jacqueline Torres-Garcia and her father are set to file a $100 million lawsuit against Connecticut's Department of Children and Families (DCF), alleging catastrophic negligence that enabled her abuse and death at the hands of her mother, Karla Garcia, and partner Jonatan Nanita. Recorded in New Britain, the case also seeks justice for Jacqueline's sister Nynah, amid revelations that DCF overlooked red flags like inadequate checks and unvisited safety probes.
A Timeline of Failure: DCF's Role Exposed
Jacqueline's DCF involvement started at her 2022 birth, with family services provided during her mother's immigration detention. Oversight continued for Jacqueline and Nynah, but the suit claims DCF faltered: No thorough background vetting, skipped visits, and hasty case closures left the girls vulnerable. In late 2025, a Nynah investigation prompted a video call—only for Garcia to confess Jacqueline had died *months earlier*, after allegedly starving and zip-tying her for two weeks. Another child was coached to impersonate her on the call.
Expert Voice: Attorney Paul Levin on the Fight Ahead
Hartford attorney Paul Levin, a seasoned child welfare litigator not directly involved in the case, pulled no punches in his WFSB interview, framing it as a "tragic" wake-up call for DCF's flaws. "This involves two vulnerable kids, one who's dead," Levin stressed, emphasizing the suit's $75M for Jacqueline's estate (covering suffering) and $25M for Nynah's trauma via father Victor Torres. He slammed the Connecticut Claims Commissioner's year-long backlog as a "notorious" barrier to court, predicting intense scrutiny: "This case will get a lot of attention because it's tragic and it should." Levin urged focus beyond dollars—"uncovering what happened, why, and how"—to spark reforms like faster vetting and follow-ups, noting the suit's real "value" lies in preventing future horrors.
DCF's Ken Mysogland responded cautiously: “We have not yet been notified... we will assess it.” No formal claim as of December 5.
Video Highlights: Levin's Urgent Call
The 2:30 WFSB video captures Levin's passion amid B-roll of the Garcia home and court docs. He details the process delays and ends with a haunting query: "The fact that someone puts a price tag on that... that's the lesser part." Reporter Kirsten Mitchard ties it to broader child welfare backlogs, urging reports to DCF's hotline (1-888-385-4225).
Path to Change
Levin's insights amplify the suit's potential to overhaul DCF amid 2,400+ unresolved complaints. As Torres fights for his daughters, this could mandate better protections—ensuring no child suffers in silence.
Source: WFSB Eyewitness News (December 4, 2025, updated December 5). https://www.wfsb.com/2025/12/
